UK’s version of MiFID delivers 'some common sense' – Wholesale Markets Review

On 1 March, HM Treasury (HMT) published their response[1] to the Wholesale Markets Review (WMR) consultation, the exercise first kicked-off by Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, at his Mansion House speech[2] last year, when he signalled that the UK would make use of “the freedom to do things differently and better”.

John Glen, the City Minister, set out the key points in his speech at an AFME[4] event yesterday – while still aligning to the principles of the EU MiFID regime, the UK has an opportunity to apply common sense to what many see as an overly complicated set of rules. The package of reforms aims to create a simpler, less prescriptive regime.

Is this the beginning of a divergence in regulatory approach between the UK and EU? Glen was quick to point out that this was not just “change for change’s sake” – it is about adapting the framework to the UK market’s needs. The response paper sets out the key objectives: 

  • Simplify the systematic internaliser regime.
  • Remove restrictions on firms’ ability to execute transactions to ensure best outcomes for investors.
  • Reconfigure the transparency regime for fixed income and derivatives markets.
  • Reduce the scope of the commodities position limits regime and delegate it to trading venues.
  • Ensure the FCA[5]  can help support the provision of a consolidated tape.

Some points of interest:

  • Trading Venues:while there is an open consultation from ESMA[6] around trading venue perimeter, the UK WMR also wants to look into the current ambiguity surrounding what is / isn’t a regulated trading venue.

“Although some respondents thought that changes to legislation were necessary to clarify the perimeter, most favoured regulatory guidance instead. The rationale for this was aligned with the position outlined in the consultation proposal; namely, that the regulatory perimeter should be flexible to accommodate changes in technology and not unduly limit innovation and competition”. As opposed to a locked-down legal definition in the EU.

  • Systematic Internalisers (SI): regime is too complex with too many calculations being required to drive the scope of SI, instead moving to a qualitative definition. Proposal to determine an SI at entity level rather an instrument level.
  • Derivative Trading Obligation: the consultation proposed bringing the counterparties in scope of the derivatives trading obligation (DTO) in line with those subject to the clearing obligation (CO). HMT also proposed to remove pre-trade transparency requirements, across all non-equity asset classes, for SIs and RFQ[7] venues (subject to giving further consideration to “all to all” RFQ venues).
  • Market Data: clear support for a consolidated tape for fixed income noting priority around data access, timeliness and quality. The government intends to make the necessary legislative changes to ensure that the FCA has all the necessary tools to take this forward when parliamentary time allows.
  • Transparency: general view that pre-trade was not as valuable as post-trade therefore efforts should be aligned to this. There are overlapping reporting requirements (e.g. MiFIR[8] transaction reporting and EMIR [9] reporting) as well as inconsistencies in the format or representation of data under the various reporting obligations. However, many have undertaken extensive implementation exercises, at significant operational and compliance costs, to meet these requirements and would therefore agree with HMT’s proposal not to make further changes.

While the direction of travel to support a common-sense approach to Wholesale Markets is welcome, many still raise questions as to how far the UK and EU may eventually diverge, despite positive rhetoric about shared principles.

This is just the start.




[3] MiFID2 Markets in Financial Instrument Directive II

[4] AFME The Association for Financial Markets in Europe

[5] FCA Financial Conduct Authority

[6] ESMA European Securities & Markets Authority

[7] RFQ Request for quote

[8] MiFIR Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation

[9] EMIR European Market Infrastructure Regulation


This article has been prepared for information purposes only, does not constitute an analysis of all potentially material issues and is subject to change at any time without prior notice. NatWest Markets does not undertake to update you of such changes.  It is indicative only and is not binding. Other than as indicated, this article has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information believed to be reliable but no representation, warranty, undertaking or assurance of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information contained in this article, nor does NatWest Markets accept any obligation to any recipient to update or correct any information contained herein. Views expressed herein are not intended to be and should not be viewed as advice or as a personal recommendation. The views expressed herein may not be objective or independent of the interests of the authors or other NatWest Markets trading desks, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to in this article. NatWest Markets will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser; nor does NatWest Markets owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this, and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on NatWest Markets for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. You should make your own independent evaluation of the relevance and adequacy of the information contained in this article and any issues that are of concern to you.

This article does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment, nor does it constitute an offer to provide any products or services that are capable of acceptance to form a contract. NatWest Markets and each of its respective affiliates accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this material or reliance on the information contained herein. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not be lawfully disclaimed.

NatWest Markets Plc. Incorporated and registered in Scotland No. 90312 with limited liability. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. NatWest Markets N.V. is incorporated with limited liability in the Netherlands, authorised and regulated by De Nederlandsche Bank and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten. It has its seat at Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and is registered in the Commercial Register under number 33002587. Registered Office: Claude Debussylaan 94, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Branch Reg No. in England BR001029. NatWest Markets Plc is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets N.V. and NatWest Markets N.V. is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets Plc. NatWest Markets Securities Japan Limited [Kanto Financial Bureau (Kin-sho) No. 202] is authorised and regulated by the Japan Financial Services Agency. Securities business in the United States is conducted through NatWest Markets Securities Inc., a FINRA registered broker-dealer (, a SIPC member ( and a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of NatWest Markets Plc.

Copyright 2022 © NatWest Markets Plc. All rights reserved.

scroll to top